next up previous
Next: Numerical Techniques Up: Numerical Methods Previous: Galaxy Models

Orbital Parameters

Initially, we focus on exactly prograde mergers of equal mass disk galaxies from zero energy orbits. This choice of encounter parameters is motivated by our desire to match systems such as the Antennae or NGC 7252, which possess long tidal tails. As shown by Toomre & Toomre (1972), these features are most easily generated when comparable mass disk galaxies collide on a prograde orbit. The orbital energy is also chosen with tail-making in mind: galaxies on high speed unbound orbits will pass by one another too quickly to form long tails, while moderately bound orbits have encounter speeds only marginally slower than zero-energy orbits. Accordingly, we choose a zero energy orbit for our fiducial set of calculations, and consider bound orbits separately in § 4.1. The galaxies are placed on their orbits with an initial separation R chosen such that the dark halos are just touching; their relative velocity is then given by .

Given the orbital energy and disk inclinations, the remaining parameter to be fixed is the impact parameter, or pericentric distance of the initial orbit. The most appropriate choice here is less clear. While collisions with small impact parameters yield a stronger tidal perturbation, they are also faster, which may inhibit the tail-building process. Conversely, slower, more distant encounters have more time to raise tidal tails, but their tidal impulse will be weaker. Rather than fixing the impact parameter, we explore a range of possibilities with b=0.6, 1.2, 2.4, and 4.8 . For a Keplerian orbit, b is simply the perigalactic separation, ; however, galaxies are not point masses, and their extended mass distributions cause the orbits to diverge from a Keplerian trajectory. The exact value of and the relative velocity at periapse, , will depend on the impact parameter b and the mass distribution for the chosen model. (We found that the orbits of the galaxies until perigalacticon are well-traced by an orbit in the effective potential where and refer to mass and potential of each galaxy. While ad hoc, this potential predicts and within 10% for the simulations in this study.) The range of covered by our calculations is shown in Figure 2, where it can be seen that and b are most discrepant for galaxies with the most massive, extended halos. In the discussion that follows we will refer to the models by their impact parameter b rather than the varying perigalactic separation.

  
Figure 2: Velocity, versus separation, at perigalacticon for zero energy orbits of prograde, equal mass galaxy mergers for the four models. The points refer to the trajectories of the 16 simulations described in the text. Lines of constant angular velocity, , at various radii in the disk are also plotted. The intersection with curves of vs. show where the orbital angular frequency is resonant with various disk spin frequencies for different galaxy trajectories at perigalacticon.

At first glance, it might appear as though the differences between b and may make interpretation of the models difficult, since for a fixed b we sample different values of in each of the models. In fact, since varies as well, this works to our advantage. For each value of b the orbital angular velocity at periapse is roughly constant in each of the models, as shown by the diagonal lines in Figure 2. The resonance between this orbital angular velocity and the rotational angular velocities in the disk is an important factor driving the formation of tidal tails during an interaction. Since the inner rotation curves of the galaxies are fixed, the different model disks all have identical , and collisions at fixed b all sample similar values of , regardless of varying for the different models.

With four galaxy models and four impact parameters, our fiducial calculations involve a total of 16 different merger simulations. While idealized, these encounters provide a best-case situation for generating long tidal tails; if galaxies with massive halos do not develop extended tails under these conditions, it will be very difficult for them to form long tails under any conditions.



next up previous
Next: Numerical Techniques Up: Numerical Methods Previous: Galaxy Models



John Dubinski
Mon Aug 28 13:57:18 PDT 1995